<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muttley Dastardly LLP: &#8220;A wholly unfamiliar level of fees&#8221;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/</link>
	<description>UK law blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charonqc</title>
		<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/#comment-16766</link>
		<dc:creator>charonqc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charonqc.wordpress.com/?p=902#comment-16766</guid>
		<description>Jacquig - good post!


Thanks.... nothing wrong with a mini rant :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacquig &#8211; good post!</p>
<p>Thanks&#8230;. nothing wrong with a mini rant <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacquig</title>
		<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/#comment-16764</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacquig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charonqc.wordpress.com/?p=902#comment-16764</guid>
		<description>Speaking as one who just got paid for something I apparently did 10 years ago and have long forgotten but who is now supposed to pay tax on invoices rendered immediately notwithstanding when they get paid and when the Bar Council have said hourly rates are no way to run a modern business (without consulting me) and once got turned down for compulsory ie non-discretionary sip by a magistrate who exited left saying they get paid quite enough as it is .... argh a mini rant .. I am with the Judge if only because I don&#039;t know how to get away with it in family case but am so honourable i have recently kicked myself out of two cases when i thought my contribution was hors de combat more rant  ripping off clients does not pay in the long run.  I gave up more remunerative commercial work when i saw the rip off in action on consultancy fees.  I would add something about giving lawyers a bad name except that is scarcely credible.

Jacquig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as one who just got paid for something I apparently did 10 years ago and have long forgotten but who is now supposed to pay tax on invoices rendered immediately notwithstanding when they get paid and when the Bar Council have said hourly rates are no way to run a modern business (without consulting me) and once got turned down for compulsory ie non-discretionary sip by a magistrate who exited left saying they get paid quite enough as it is &#8230;. argh a mini rant .. I am with the Judge if only because I don&#8217;t know how to get away with it in family case but am so honourable i have recently kicked myself out of two cases when i thought my contribution was hors de combat more rant  ripping off clients does not pay in the long run.  I gave up more remunerative commercial work when i saw the rip off in action on consultancy fees.  I would add something about giving lawyers a bad name except that is scarcely credible.</p>
<p>Jacquig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawminx</title>
		<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/#comment-16749</link>
		<dc:creator>lawminx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charonqc.wordpress.com/?p=902#comment-16749</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr Muttley/ Mr Geeklawyer,

One wonders if you will both, in the fullness of time amalgamate your respective business/practice in a sort of GIGANTIC Poly-Tesco-Law-Trust-Status-Mega-City Firm charging frankly SURREAL fees/extended refreshers under the name MuttleyGeek and Partners or GeekieMutt  LLP or some such other amazing connotation.
The City awaits your decision with baited breath even as Allen and Ovaries decide to declare themselves immediately bankrupt in the face of such competition....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr Muttley/ Mr Geeklawyer,</p>
<p>One wonders if you will both, in the fullness of time amalgamate your respective business/practice in a sort of GIGANTIC Poly-Tesco-Law-Trust-Status-Mega-City Firm charging frankly SURREAL fees/extended refreshers under the name MuttleyGeek and Partners or GeekieMutt  LLP or some such other amazing connotation.<br />
The City awaits your decision with baited breath even as Allen and Ovaries decide to declare themselves immediately bankrupt in the face of such competition&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charonqc</title>
		<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/#comment-16717</link>
		<dc:creator>charonqc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charonqc.wordpress.com/?p=902#comment-16717</guid>
		<description>Mr Geeklawyer:  We had your clerk on the phone eighteen times this morning and twice this afternoon.  He appears to be most assiduous in prosecuting the collection of fees and in the provision of statements at hourly intervals.  

I notice that your clerk&#039;s  telephone number appears to be a Monaco number.  Yet your email IP indicates that you appear to be in somewhere called Wolverhampton.  I&#039;ve just been told by The Foreign Office where Wolverhampton is. 

You have my sympathy - but, look on the bright side....  negative equity may well take longer to hit Wolverhampton.

You may be sure that I shall lose no time at all in attending to your fee note.

Kind regards


per pro

Matt Muttley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Geeklawyer:  We had your clerk on the phone eighteen times this morning and twice this afternoon.  He appears to be most assiduous in prosecuting the collection of fees and in the provision of statements at hourly intervals.  </p>
<p>I notice that your clerk&#8217;s  telephone number appears to be a Monaco number.  Yet your email IP indicates that you appear to be in somewhere called Wolverhampton.  I&#8217;ve just been told by The Foreign Office where Wolverhampton is. </p>
<p>You have my sympathy &#8211; but, look on the bright side&#8230;.  negative equity may well take longer to hit Wolverhampton.</p>
<p>You may be sure that I shall lose no time at all in attending to your fee note.</p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
<p>per pro</p>
<p>Matt Muttley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/muttley-dastardly-llp-a-wholly-unfamiliar-level-of-fees/#comment-16716</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charonqc.wordpress.com/?p=902#comment-16716</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Allen &amp; Ovaries here. Good lawyers should be paid their dues. So should bad ones.

And, in the interests of justice, a barrister&#039;s fee note should always be paid. Ideally, twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Allen &amp; Ovaries here. Good lawyers should be paid their dues. So should bad ones.</p>
<p>And, in the interests of justice, a barrister&#8217;s fee note should always be paid. Ideally, twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
