
The Guardian reported this morning: Police floated imposter theory over Ian Tomlinson’s death at G20 protests
A senior police officer who investigated the death of Ian Tomlinson told his family that the officer who struck him at the G20 demonstrations could have been a member of the public “dressed in police uniform”, it emerged last night….
…The City of London police completely failed to persuade the Tomlinson family of its impartiality, not least when they were told by an investigating officer that he was not ruling out the possibility that the alleged assailant may be a member of the public dressed in police uniform,” it said. A source present at the 8 April meeting said the senior investigator’s comment was made after he was pressed on how the identity of the officer could be established from the video.The investigator agreed that the man who struck Tomlinson was likely to have been a police officer, but could “not rule out” the possibility that he was a member of the public.
This is a rather bizarre way to go about things…. fortunately independent investigation is being carried out… at least I hope it is. Ironically… police officers are ‘members of the public dressed in police uniform’ – although some of them appear to think they are there to control us rather than protect.

Is this a variant on ‘a big boy did it and ran away’?
Course, does make you wonder then if they aren’t all impostors and none can be trusted…..
White Rabbit / John…. a most bizarre tale!
One sometimes wonders what goes on inside the heads of some coppers….. talk about shooting oneself in the foot. This guy blasted both his feet off with a 12 bore shotgun….
I thought plod were members of the public in police uniform the problem is on G20 evidence they ought to be in prison uniform.