![]() |
Lawcast 124: Jacqui Gilliat, Barrister, on the problems arising out of the reduction of legal aid in family cases. Today I am talking to Jacqui Gilliat, Barrister, 4 Brick Court and author of the Bloody Relations and Family Law Week blogs about the proposed reduction in legal aid in family law cases. |
Archive for March 30th, 2009
Lawcast 124: Jacqui Gilliat, Barrister, on the problems arising out of the reduction of legal aid in family cases.
Posted in Charon, Charon Podcasts on Monday, March 30, 2009| 3 Comments »
Lawcast 123: Alasdair Pearce about his law degree studies at Cambridge University
Posted in Charon, Charon Podcasts on Monday, March 30, 2009| Leave a Comment »
![]() |
Lawcast 123: Alasdair Pearce about his law degree studies at Cambridge University Today I am talking to Alasdair Pearce about his experience at Cambridge University where he is in the second year of a law degree and his planning for the BVC and pupillage. |
Public have their say on how criminals payback
Posted in Charon, Charon after a glass Pics on Monday, March 30, 2009| 4 Comments »
Public have their say on how criminals payback
Ministry of Justice: A new campaign that explains how the public can have their say on the work offenders carry out on Community Payback was launched today by Justice Secretary Jack Straw and Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.
This latest idea from the government has the whiff of being half baked. Now, in addition to the branded Hi-Viz yellow jackets to be worn by criminals doing ‘community payback’, The Ministry of Justice has plans for the public to be able to vote through DirectGov on the type of punishment criminals should receive. I have a feeling this ‘new initiative’ will descend into a TV style farce with nutters suggesting hanging, the pillory, keelhauling and couch potatoes from across the land and the more moronic will probably want to ‘phone a friend’ to get advice before voting.
In a mature society – which we used to be – elected politicians, not hell bent on securing votes, taking advice from judges, probation officers, experts in penal theory etc etc seems a far better way of meting out justice than this possibly and potentially ludicrous “Criminal X Factor” Style proposal. We shall see.
Nice one Jack… looking forward to your retirement after the next election?