Archive for the ‘Rive Gauche’ Category
It may give The Twitterati some transient pleasure to mock one of the finest gentlemen to have ever graced the House of Commons benches by referring to him as a ‘Crime Scene in Progress’ – I talk of no other than Lord Chancellor Grayling, a man of vision who made his long walk to freedom from obscurity to hold one of the highest offices of state in the land: Lord Chancellor – the first non-lawyer to serve as Lord Chancellor since the Earl of Shaftesbury in 1672-3. It did not end well for The Earl of Shaftesbury, it has to be said – although charges of High Treason were dropped and Shaftesbury fled to Amsterdam, fell ill, and soon died. But, be that as it may.
And as for those of you with a predilection for trawling through Wikipedia for amusing nonsense on Chris Grayling and other fellow Conservative MPs to find this sort of thing…..shame on you!
Between 2001 and 2009, Grayling claimed expenses for his flat in Pimlico, close to the Houses of Parliament, despite having a constituency home no further than 17 miles away and owning two buy to let properties in Wimbledon. Grayling says he uses the flat when “working very late” because he needs to “work very erratic and late hours most days when the House of Commons is sitting.”
During the Parliamentary expenses scandal, The Daily Telegraph reported that Grayling refitted and redecorated the flat in 2005 costing over £5,000. Grayling said that both the water and electrical systems failed “leaving the place needing a major overhaul”.
Grayling’s expenses issue was seen as embarrassing for the Conservative Party as he had previously criticised Labour ministers for being implicated in sleaze scandals.
There is more to heaven and earth Horatio than was dreamt of in Wikipedia…. and on that note, I bid you good day. Although I am partial to the Australian greeting…”Gooday mate, how’s it hanging?” when unable to avoid socialists in the house.
I am not a ‘grinch’ but I am not a great fan of the annual Christmas period. I found it pretty tedious as a child and still do. But, here we are at the start of a new year; an opportunity to repeat mistakes of old and an opportunity to craft a few new ones.
It would appear that French influence in the world is waning?
I have decided to return to riding motorbikes. A car in London isn’t of any value to me and, in any event, I far preferred my motorbikes to the many cars I had in my past. So, I shall sell the Jaguar and buy a Honda Blackbird. (I have had five of these marvellous bikes in the past – always started and not one breakdown.)
So…let’s kick off the new year with a look at what Tim Kevan’s marvellous creation Babybarista is up to: Solicitor Advocate
“Jo Worby is one of those rare people in business who is more interested in talking about other people’s success. “ Clare Rodway, of the wonderful Kysen PR firm, writes an excellent blog: The Conversation. Here she interviews Jo Warby
John Bolch continues, pleasingly, to cast a sharp and, at times, caustic eye over matters relating to Family Law. His Saturday Review is well worth a look – with a rather spectacular graphic in the post. The following quote will give you a taste of John’s left field approach to the subject. (He does serious as well, though)… “The only time my wife and I had a simultaneous orgasm was when the judge signed the divorce papers.” ~ Woody Allen
This is why Criminal barristers are taking action on Monday 6th January
Fellow blogger and podcaster, Carl Gardner, writes: Alan Turing: a strain’d quality of irrational and arbitrary mercy
John Flood on his RATs blog continues to analyse the profession:
“In law we live in comparative prehistoric times. Regulation is our protection, our safeguard, to prevent savages from invading our sacred spaces…”
Are We About to See the Arrival of Multidisciplinary Practices?
Simon Myerson QC – always a pleasure to read – pulls no punches in this blog post:
Ahead of Monday’s action (reminder: which I reluctantly support), the MoJ has published an “Ad Hoc Statistical Release”. Its purpose is clearly to prejudice readers, which will include the media, against the Bar. As such it is a disgusting piece of work – a Ministry should not seek to argue a political case against a group of private citizens at all, still less by the use of data obtained in an effort to promote ‘efficiency’. The counter-argument is that everyone is entitled to “the truth”. Alas, that argument cannot properly be deployed in this case because….
Obiter J in his Law and Lawyers blog asks: New Year’s Eve 2013 (1) – Are Human Rights approaching a knife edge?
“There is no British diplomatic mission in Syria, no latter-day Foley can help any of those facing death and destitution….”
Francis Fitzgibbon QC explains in his blog Nothing Like The Sun: Righteous Among the Nations?
And finally – Dan Hull in his WhatAboutClients blog writes:
There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full.
–Henry Kissinger, quoted in The New York Times Magazine, June 1, 1969
Answer: You choose fights more carefully–and you go on the offensive only when you must. As Rome discovered too late, protecting every terrain and border is expensive and draining. As business and trial people learn young, butting heads with everyone who has ever done you a disservice, or fighting every point in an oral argument, or an evidentiary or discovery dispute, will not just be expensive and draining. It will defeat you. And it will make you go bonkers.
Back later in the day… hopefully.
It is a bit early in the new year for any law firm, or lawyer for that matter, to have managed to get themselves into the Darwin Awards or appear as a feature on RollonFriday or Legal Cheek, so I shall have to content myself with other matters…
This transatlantic trade deal is a full-frontal assault on democracyBrussels has kept quiet about a treaty that would let rapacious companies subvert our laws, rights and national sovereignty
“The purpose of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is to remove the regulatory differences between the US and European nations. I mentioned it a couple of weeks ago. But I left out the most important issue: the remarkable ability it would grant big business to sue the living daylights out of governments which try to defend their citizens. It would allow a secretive panel of corporate lawyers to overrule the will of parliament and destroy our legal protections. Yet the defenders of our sovereignty say nothing.
Reflecting on the death of the wonderful John Fortune and his satirical creations, with John Bird, led me to Google. There is a big difference between ‘satirical’ and satyrical. An error of typing led me into a very strange world of Google pics. At least some lawyers only wear the hair of a horse on their heads. The amateur Satyrs go for a half man half horse look. It isn’t a good look, judging by the pictures on offer on Google.
RIP one of the creators of Sir George Parr – the clips always worth a second or third look.
Well..there we are. The new year is underway and a bit of real work beckons.
I was in a cafe in Kennington over lunch talking with my real brother (as opposed to Professor R.D. Charon) and saw the poster above on the wall. I rather liked it. I have had the pleasure of meeting people who do daft things after a good shot of coffee. Mind you the stuff they put up their noses after taking a sip of coffee probably didn’t help the clarity of their thinking…. but they were certainly ‘animated’….veritable Duracell bunnies they were.
And now, to kick off proceedings…. The death of the blog : Long live the law blog
Silence is not always golden
I came across an interesting article on The In-House Lawyer from MacFarlanes LLP – Silence is not always golden:
In PGF II SA v OMFS Company 1 Ltd , the Court of Appeal considered, for the first time, whether a failure by a party to respond to an invitation to mediate should be treated as an unreasonable refusal to mediate – previous cases having focused on situations where there had been an express refusal to do so.
The Court of Appeal held that silence in the face of an offer to mediate is of itself unreasonable – even if circumstances exist which would justify an express refusal to mediate.
I may have overdone the ‘Law’ content (above) for the festive season… so… onwards with little in the way of ‘The law’ getting in the way…
Beaubodor is a very talented artist and humourist who has a good record of ‘hitting the nail on the head’. I always enjoy his pictures. Visit the Beaubodor website
One website where I can be certain of avoiding ‘the Law’ – but still about ‘Law’ – is Legal Cheek, a website I particularly enjoy.
Here – the 10 most-read Legal Cheek Stories of 2013 : From Ward LJ “This case involves a number of – and here I must not fall into Dr Spooner’s error – warring bankers.”
Never in the field of human conflict has so little been done by so few for so many….?
It would appear that the Prime Minister may well have been mildly ‘over-refreshed’. Did he come up with the ‘bright idea’ of appointing Chris Grayling as Lord Chancellor after his evening out?
John Bolch over at Family Lore has an amusing Review of the Year…
I am a fan of Clare Rodway’s The Conversation blog – here she interviews Jo Warby
Jo Worby is one of those rare people in business who is more interested in talking about other people’s success. She is also rare in being a female managing partner. She has developed ambitious plans for her law firm, Maidstone-based Brachers, since taking on the role and a lot of them are focussed on engaging the people in her business…..
I am also a fan of Charles Pugsley Fincher and his art…
Carl Gardner is a ‘precision law blogger’ and a good friend and accomplice in our Without Prejudice podcasts – which will return soon. This recent blog post is well worth a read: Alan Turing: a strain’d quality of irrational and arbitrary mercy
I must not overdo the ‘legal thinking’ or ‘thinking legal’ … back on the morrow with more.
Hat Tip to @PCAK_Law
For legal regulators and others who take twitter too seriously: My podcast with a fictional lawyer called @Geeklawyer
Listen to the podcast: A surreal and most enjoyable chat with a fellow parodist….
I did this a couple of years ago – when everyone knew that @Geeklawyer was a satirist…. but hadn’t turned themselves into Sherlocks to discover the identity behind 🙂